The Red Mass
St. Mary’s
Cathedral, Edinburgh
8th
October 2006
In today’s
Gospel, Jesus talks of man, woman and children. In fact he talks
of husband, wife and children, which we have come to call the
family.
The family
constituted by parents, a man and woman married to each other,
and their offspring, has been the basic cell of society in
pre-Christian, Christian and non-Christian cultures for
millennia. Until now.
Now a raft of
legislative measures here in Scotland as elsewhere has
jeopardised, recklessly I think, family life as intended by
God’s purpose for human beings created in his image and
likeness.
As men and
women of the legal profession, these legislative measures will
be well known to you. Some of them are these: The Family Law Act
which makes divorce even quicker and gives quasi-marital status
to de facto heterosexual unions. Civil Partnership
legislation allows homosexual couples to register their
relationships and enjoy a civil status analogous to marriage.
The Gender Recognition Act allows people to choose to be male or
female irrespective of their sex.
The Catholic
Church’s view of these kinds of developments here and elsewhere
is well known. We have protested all of these measures. Our
reaction to civil partnership legislation is typical of our
stance. The social teaching of the Church could not be clearer:
“By putting homosexual unions on a legal plane analogous to that
of marriage and family life, the State acts arbitrarily and in
contradiction with its duties” (CSDC 228).
This may seem
hard on legislators. Yet I have some sympathy for them!. They
are making provisions for a very diverse, pluralist, secular
society, which is being encouraged to become intolerant of and
even hostile to the Christian patrimony of this country. They
have to respond to pressure groups and focus groups and all
kinds of well-organised, well-financed and very determined
alliances. And, while the Catholic Church speaks clearly enough
on these matters, the Christian voice is sadly muffled, so
legislators can more easily set our opinions aside.
As I say, I
have some sympathy for legislators, but not a lot. They should
know better what is good for society, and in some cases they do
know better but ignore it in the interests of power. For
instance, all reputable research shows that children do better
with two parents who are husband and wife. But political
correctness, very often the enemy of right thinking and freedom
of speech, practically forbids this to be said because it will
offend some group’s sensitivities.
But the main
reason I do not have sympathy for the legislators who have
enacted these laws is because the truth of marriage and of the
family is not just a mystery of faith but belongs to the natural
law and is accessible by reason. Even many non-Christian
societies have recognised this. Unfortunately, in our times, the
minds of many have been so darkened by hubris and by the selfish
pursuit of their own gratification that they have lost sight of
the natural law which God has written into his creation so that
even those who do not believe in him may reach out for the truth
and so be disposed, however inchoately, to God’s presence in the
world. Even if they cannot be blamed for not having faith, I
suspect that God will call them to account for ignoring the
promptings of their own right reason. They are fortunate that He
is more merciful than they are!
So in this
context it is more than ever necessary for us to be
strengthened, enlightened, consoled and inspired by the Word of
God. In today’s gospel, Jesus makes it clear that divorce and
remarriage is not the way he wants his disciples to live.
Divorce may have been possible to some extent in his time under
the Mosaic Law, just as it is possible, very much more possible,
almost to the point of becoming a self-fufilling prophecy, in
our society. But it is decidedly not what God wants. Jesus
appeals to the mystery of creation. God made them male and
female, man and woman, as the first form of communion between
persons. “This is why a man must leave father and mother, and
the two become one body. They are no longer two, therefore, but
one body. So then, what God has joined together, man must not
divide.” This is the wonderful vision of marriage which the
Catholic Church offers to her children and to all men and women.
It is the vision of marriage which still basically unites
Christians, Jews, Muslims and adherents of other respected
religions. It is the vision of marriage too which basically
inspires any man and woman who marry with true love in their
hearts. They want lasting, enduring, faithful love. This vision
of marriage is the hope of right reason as well the gift of
faith.
Sadly,
however, lasting, enduring, faithful love is not always what
happens. The Church knows this and, while upholding the sanctity
of the marriage bond, has developed a compassionate pastoral
attitude to people whose marriages have broken up, encouraging
them to remain part of the life of the Church and offering them
the things that only the Church can offer to help them to
lighten their burden. As you know, there is also the possibility
of an annulment appeal to a Church Tribunal. As you know, the
Scottish Catholic Tribunal investigates among other things
serious defects in the original consent exchanged by the couple
such as to render that consent null, and so carries out an
essential obligation of the Church to bring justice in a timely
manner to its appellants.
As you know
too, marriage breakdown often ends in a civil divorce. Divorce
settlement is bread and butter to the legal profession. Here
Catholic lawyers are in the unenviable position of having to
facilitate a legal procedure, civil divorce, which is a grave
offence against the natural law because it claims to break the
contract to which the spouses freely consented, to live with
each other till death.
The Catechism
of the Catholic Church gives a chilling but completely realistic
description of the pernicious effects of divorce on spouses,
children and society: “Divorce is immoral also because it
introduces disorder into the family and into society. This
disorder brings grave harm to the deserted spouse, to children
traumatised by the separation of their parents and often torn
between them, and because of its contagious effect which makes
it truly a plague on society” (CCC 2385). So no one, my dear
brothers and sisters, should ever get blasé about divorce.
At the same
time, we know that a civil divorce may be the only way to tidy
up what is already a tragic mess for spouses and children. In
these circumstances, civil divorce may be the only possible way
of ensuring certain legal rights, the safety of one of the
spouses, the care of the children or the protection of
inheritance. And in these cases, divorce does not constitute a
moral offence (CCC 2383). Re-marriage is another matter, but
that is not usually the concern of lawyers.
So I would
hope that Catholic lawyers will bring to this situation their
Catholic principles and conscience about the sanctity of
marriage which means that saving the marriage is always a
possibility and that divorce is never going to be a quick-fix
solution to a problem. (I am told that good lawyers nearly
always first put the case for staying together to their clients
who are in the throes of marriage breakdown). They will, of
course, carry out their work to the best of their professional
ability in the best interests of their clients and their
children. And in the context of the legal profession and in
dealing with politicians, legislators and civic leaders, they
should not hesitate to defend the sanctity of marriage and to
underline the nefarious consequences of a divorce mentality on
the common good of our society. Lawyers are also well placed to
bring to the attention of legislators and others the value of
public funding for programmes of marriage preparation and of
marriage counselling which give a high priority to safeguarding
and preserving the marriage bond. This would be a worthwhile
contribution to creating a social capital of stable family life.
This, my dear brothers and sisters, is the kind of witness to
which Catholic lay people are called through their baptism,
confirmation and membership of the Church.
Finally, my
dear brothers and sisters, let me conclude by affirming our
faith that Christian marriage is a holy mystery and a noble
vocation. It signifies the union of Christ and the Church. It
gives spouses the grace to love each other with the love with
which Christ loved his Church. It is based on the consent of a
man and woman to give themselves to each other mutually and
definitively, in order to live a covenant of faithful and
fruitful love. Marriage in Christ gives rise to the Christian
home where children receive the first proclamation of the faith.
The family home is rightly called “the domestic Church”, a
community of grace and prayer, a school of human virtues and of
Christian charity.
May you who
are married have the joy of living in such a union. May you all,
in your professional lives, find the strength in Christ to
uphold the sacredness of marriage in your work and in the public
square, for the common good of our society and of our country.
|